Back

Passion Q &A    Larry d. Wright

Many have seen the film The Passion of the Christ and here are the most frequent questions and my responses. NOTE: The sources I have used are cited at the end of is work. 

Click for a response to the question...

  1. Why did Mel Gibson make this film?

  2. Is the film anti-Semitic?

  3. Why does the movie have to be so violent?

  4. Was there really a snake in the Garden of Gethsemane?

  5. What is the significance of the dove that Jesus saw?

  6. What was the meaning of all the flies?

  7. What about the bread and wine?

  8. Who was the lady who brought the cup of water to Jesus while He was carrying His cross to Golgotha?

  9.  I've heard that Mel Gibson used as a source for the script used a book written by a nun in the 19th century. Is that true?

  10. Did Jesus really fall off the bridge when the Temple Guards were leading Him from the Garden of Gethsemane? 

  11. Were the scourging scenes realistic? What would the crucifixion really have been like?

  12. I've heard the movie is based on the "Stations of the Cross." What does that mean?

  13. What's the deal with the character representing Satan and the baby that is being held?

  14. What was the meaning of the white cloths that Pilate's wife gave to Mary?

  15. Did children really chase Judas to his hanging? What about the carcass on the field beneath the tree where Judas hung himself?

  16. Do the gospels record a raven attacking the bad thief (Gesmas) , the one speaking against Christ?

  17. What are my Sources?

 Why did Mel Gibson make this film?

Mel Gibson, devout in the old Roman Catholic tradition who favors the Tridentine Latin Mass, describes his film: "I think of it as contemplative in the sense that one is compelled to remember ... in a spiritual way, which cannot be articulated, only experienced."

Gibson explains the genesis of his film: “The past three years forced me to focus heavily on the Passion...I went to the wounds of Christ in order to cure my wounds. And when I did that, through reading and studying and meditating and praying, I began to see in my own mind what he [Jesus] really went through... . It was like giving birth: the story, the way I envisioned the suffering of Christ, got inside me and started to grow, and it reached a point where I just had to tell it, to get it out” Quoted by David Neff, "The Passion of Mel Gibson: Why evangelicals are cheering a movie with profoundly Catholic sensibilities," (http://www.christianitytoday.com/movies/commentaries/passion-passionofmel.html).

(top)

 Is the film anti-Semitic?

Personally, I do not think that it is but as a Christian Gentile I cannot see it through Jewish eyes.

To me, Mel Gibson makes it clear that the suffering of Jesus Christ's was carried out not for himself but for others, because of the sins of humanity and by the sins of cruel men. I see a clear presentation of Christ's substitutionary death for humanity. Gibson does this from the beginning with the quotation from Isaiah 53:5. I see this as the key hanging on the front porch. Gibson masterfully includes a dimension in his telling of the story that reveals the fact that he understands that the real and effectual drama that takes place is in the unseen spiritual realm.

It is sin that killed Jesus! As long as we fight over, “Whose sin?” then we miss the point. We must move above earthy arguments and gain a heavenly perspective to understand the death of Jesus.

In his interview with Raymond Arroyo of EWTN, Mel Gibson explains, "You're seeing the big realm. It's not about us; it's about principalities. And it's about the big war that's going on. . . . The big realms, the dark and the light realms are battling over us, and the battle happens. We can't see it, but it's there. And that is what I wanted to show in the film . . . that the diabolical shows itself, and at times the divine peeks through, so you look under the surface and there it is. You're looking right at it."

From the opening scenes in the Garden of Gethsemane the Devil attempts to impede Jesus' resolve to go to the cross. Twice the camera takes viewers above the cross to offer God's view of the crucifixion. One view entails a divine teardrop that triggers the earthquake that accompanies the crucifixion. That was my favorite scene in the movie! The other view entails Satan's frustrated cry of defeat in failing to prevent Jesus' crucifixion.

From high above Golgotha, these two views make it evident that the death of Jesus is to satisfy the Heavenly Father's purposes, not ultimately to satisfy the interests of Satan or of mere humans on the stage in Jerusalem, Jewish or Gentile. Jewish religious authorities, whose petty interests move them to protect their place of influence both with Rome and with the Judeans, render them important earthly players who, unknown to them, fulfill God's purposes on the earthly stage of the heavenly drama of Christ's Passion. Likewise, Roman governing officials and soldiers, who seek to suppress Jewish insurrections so that their time in unpleasant Judea may pass without incident, unknowingly do God's bidding as well as they attempt to placate Jewish authorities who find a Galilean peasant rivaling their authority as religious leaders of the people.

Similarly, pathetic Judas, whose frustration and avarice hatch a plot with the Jewish priests to betray his leader, finds himself caught up in the drama of God's own making that far transcends his selfish interests but sadly brings him to his own tormented demise. Thus, as the movie begins with the text of Isaiah 53:5, "He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are healed", so the film closes with a clear message for those with eyes to see that the story is that of God's provision of redemption by the sacrifice of his Son, Jesus Christ, on behalf of others.

Each viewer will approach the film differently depending upon one's own paradigm and viewpoint, whether Catholic or Protestant, believer or unbeliever, pastor or pew-sitter, biblical scholar or not. All who view the film will be exposed to the gospel of Jesus Christ with powerful images and biblically derived dialogue.    

(top)

Why does the movie have to be so violent?

The Passion of The Christ is brutal and violent! It is not surprising at all, but to be expected that Mel Gibson would be criticized for making this movie and for its depictions.  Remember, this is not a documentary; it is an artist’s rendering of the Passion of the Christ. He has admittedly taken artistic license and interpretations as all moviemakers do. 

I agree with James O. Davis, Cofounder/President/CEO of Global Pastors Network who said, "My response then and now is that "R stands for Redemption and it was royal red.  For too long, the world has not seen, heard, and felt what the crucifixion was about for Christ.  The English word, "excruciating" comes from the word, "crucifixion." If you want to know what really is excruciating, then you MUST go and see The Passion Of The Christ.  Your life will be changed for the better and for eternity."

Perhaps none of us have ever completely realized the depth of Christ’s payment for out sins. The movie is violent because the last twelve hours of Christ life were violent, extremely violent.

READ: In addition to the account of the passion in the Gospels, Isaiah 53:1-12; 1 Peter 1:17-25; Hebrews 9:11-28.

(top)

Was there really a snake in the Garden of Gethsemane?

In the movie when Jesus is praying in the Garden of Gethsemane, a snake slithers through the body and out from under the robe of the Tempter.  Jesus is praying and agonizing in preparation for what he is about to endure.  The snake moves menacingly towards Jesus.  Jesus looks the Tempter in the eye and defiantly crushes the snake underfoot, and resolutely turns to meet his captors. This is my second favorite scene!   

There is no literal snake in the gospels account of Gethsemane but clearly Satan was present in an agonizing way. The snake in the Garden of Gethsemane symbolizes temptation and evil.  In Eden, the garden of creation, Adam and Eve were enticed by the serpent to disobey God and eat the forbidden fruit.  Because

 

they heeded the promptings of the serpent and rejected God’s instruction, mankind was infected with evil.  Consequently, the relationship between God and the human race was fractured.

The law of the universe dictates that a holy God cannot interact with people who are tainted with sin.  But even in Eden, the scene of that unthinkably horrible cosmic tragedy, God foretold of the coming Deliverer, the Messiah who would crush the power of evil under his foot.  God said the snake would “strike the heel” of the Messiah, that is, inflict pain and injury on him but ultimately, the Messiah would triumph.  Evil would be totally crushed.  The consequence of mankind’s choice in the Garden of Eden would be reversed by the choice Jesus would make in the Garden of Gethsemane.

READ: Genesis 3:1-15.

(top)

What is the significance of the dove that Jesus saw?

As the soldiers drag Jesus to the commencement of his trial, He looks up and sees a dove flapping its wings overhead.  The sight appears to strengthen and comfort him.

Doves and turtle-doves were the only birds that could be offered in sacrifice, as they were clean according to the Mosaic Law (Genesis 15:9Leviticus 5:7, 12:6Luke 2:24). The dove is an emblem of peace (Genesis 8:8,10), purity (Psalm 68:13), and devoted affection (Song of Songs 1:15, 2:14).  But above all, it’s a symbol of the Holy Spirit (Genesis 1:2; Matthew 3:16Mark 1:10; Luke 3:22John 1:32). 

The sight of the dove reminded Jesus that, just as He was anointed for ministry at His baptism (Matthew 3:16), so He is anointed by the presence of God’s Holy Spirit to face this dreadful hour.  The dove also reminded him of the love of his Father and that his Father was pleased with his self-sacrificial obedience.

READ: Matthew 3:16; Luke 3:22.

(top)

What was the meaning of all the flies?

In one scene the buzz in Judas’ head grew louder.  Flies.  There were flies everywhere!  They were swarming in droves around him.  He couldn’t get away. Finally, in despair he fastened a rope around his neck and hung himself.

One of the names of Satan is Beelzebub, which means “the Prince of Demons” (Matthew 12:24, 27; Mark 3:22; Luke 11:15, 18; John 12:4-6).  In Semitic speech the term may have also been understood as “the master of the house” (Matthew 10:25b).  The Hebrew word for Beelzebub literally means “lord of the flies.” The buzzing of flies that preceded Judas’ suicide symbolized that Satan had used and defeated Judas.

READ: John 13:2, 21-28

(top)

What about the bread and wine?

As Christ’s body is brutalized and his blood begins to flow, he thinks back to the bread and the wine that he shared with his disciples at the Passover meal. The Passover was also called the “feast of unleavened bread” (Ex. 23:15; Mark 14:1; Acts 12:3), because during its celebration no leavened bread was to be eaten or even kept in the household (Ex. 12:15).  In Hebrew tradition, leaven (yeast) symbolized sin.  Prior to eating the Passover meal, participants searched for forbidden leaven and discarded it.  Then, and only then, did the ceremonial meal begin. 

The Passover meal contained symbolic elements of roasted lamb, unleavened bread, bitter herbs, some minor condiments and four cups of wine at specified points.  Of the three pieces of unleavened bread, which were kept in a three-layered pouch, only one piece was removed, broken, and shared.   The four cups of wine were called the cup of sanctification, the cup of deliverance, the cup of redemption, and the cup of hope.  

All the elements of the Passover meal related back to the historic event of the deliverance of the Hebrew people from bondage.  But at the last supper, Jesus indicated that these traditional elements foreshadowed deeper spiritual truths.  He said that the bread symbolized his body, and that the cup symbolized the covenant in his blood (a covenant is a legal contract).  Jesus knew that when he gave his body (which was free of sin just as the bread was free of leaven) to be broken – and his blood to be spilled – that he would secure sanctification, deliverance, redemption, and hope for all people.  Jesus was the Passover lamb.  He was the bread.  He was the wine.  He was the One in whom all the symbols found their fulfillment. 

READ: Exodus 12:14-20; Matthew 26:20-29; 1 Corinthians 11:23-34.

 (top)

Who was the lady who brought the cup of water to Jesus while He was carrying His cross to Golgotha?

Although the Roman guards cast her aside, this matron named Veronica has not been cast aside by church history. Although she is not mentioned in the Bible, the story of Veronica and her veil has been around since the 4th century. In the movie, you'll notice that she hands a towel to the fallen Christ, who dries His face with it. When He pulls the towel away from His face, you'll notice an imprint of His likeness. This towel has become known as the "Veil of Veronica."

Like many traditions from the ancient church, many Catholics revere the veil because it is said to have the imprint of Christ's face on it. Again, the story does not have a Biblical corollary, but it provides an illustration of deep devotion and service to the Savior. The name "Veronica" means "true image" (from "ver" for truth and "icon" for image.)

 (top)

I've heard that Mel Gibson used as a source for the script used a book written by a nun in the 19th century. Is that true?

Mel Gibson has said on several occasions that the movie was inspired by the writings of a nun named Anna Catherine Emmerich, and it would be difficult to overestimate her influence on Gibson's explanation of the story of Christ's final hours before the cross. In fact, Emmerich's meditations from the 18th century provide many insights into Gibson's film-making motivation and selection of scenes. A public-domain PDF of Emmerich's book, The Dolorous Passion of Jesus Christ our Lord, is available to read at www.emmerich1.com/THE_PASSION.htm. The book details Emmerich's many spiritual visions related to Jesus.

Many of the scenes found in the movie are found in Emmerich's book. Some of her visions are extraordinarily unusual, and the reader should be mindful that this is simply one person's perspective and imagination of the events. While we view the book alone as the inspired Word of God, such extra-biblical sources as the work of Emmerich are to be regarded as inspirational but not infallible. Emmerich's thoughts are helpful for understanding Gibson's movie and for a believer's personal reflection.

(top)

Did Jesus really fall off the bridge when the Temple Guards were leading Him from the Garden of Gethsemane? 

This does not appear in the New Testament text. Rather, this is one of the places where director Mel Gibson was inspired by the writings of Emmerich. 

(top)

Were the scourging scenes realistic? What would the crucifixion really have been like?

The Journal of the American Medical Association. JAMA printed an article called "On the Physical Death of Jesus Christ" in its March 21, 1986 issue. Dr. William D. Edwards (Department of Pathology at Mayo Clinic) and a pastor named Wesley Gabel wrote the study. The study is accompanied by extensive illustrations by medical illustrator Floyd Hosmer. To access this description, go to the web page of First Baptist Church of Fort Lauderdale (www.fbcnet.com) and click on The Physical Death of Jesus in the Passion Q & A section. Please note that this description and its illustrations are intense and extremely graphic.

(top)

I've heard the movie is based on the "Stations of the Cross." What does that mean?

The Stations of the Cross is a pattern of devotion practiced by Catholics and those in more liturgical traditions. Each of these "stations" tracks an event along the "Via Dolorosa," as Jesus walked from Pilate's court at Antonio Fortress to the site of the crucifixion. If you consider the fourteen stations of meditation, you'll see a pattern emerge which is reflected in Gibson's film. The links below provide a glimpse into each of the fourteen stations: 

1.     First Station Jesus is condemned.

2.     Second Station Jesus takes up his cross.

3.     Third Station Jesus falls 1st time.

4.     Fourth Station Jesus meets Mary.

5.     Fifth Station Simon Helps

6.     Sixth Station Veronica

7.     Seventh Station Jesus falls 2nd time

8.     Eighth Station Jesus speaks to the women.

9.     Ninth Station Jesus falls a 3rd time.

10.  Tenth Station Jesus is stripped.

11.  Eleventh Station Jesus nailed to cross.

12.  Twelfth Station Jesus dies on the Cross.

13.  Thirteenth Station Jesus taken down.

14.  Fourteenth Station Jesus placed in tomb.

Typically, Protestants don't focus on the Stations of the Cross, but understanding them to be informative. When Protestants do reflect on the Stations of the Cross, they usually use a shortened version that has more historical background:

Station 1:  Pilate Condemns Jesus to Die
Station 2:  Jesus Accepts His Cross
Station 3:  Simon Helps Carry the Cross
Station 4:  Jesus Speaks to the Women
Station 5:  Jesus Is Stripped of His Garments
Station 6:  Jesus Is Nailed to the Cross
Station 7:  Jesus Cares for His Mother
Station 8:  Jesus Dies on the Cross

(top)

What's the deal with the character representing Satan and the baby that is being held?

According to Gibson's representatives, this is an illustration of the Anti-Madonna. Throughout the film, extensive opposing interplay exists between Mary, the mother of Christ, and Satan, who is portrayed androgynously but clearly with feminine features. The Madonna, illustrating Mary holding the Christ-Child in her arms, is revered throughout Christendom. The Anti-Madonna is intended to be an illustration of humanity gone terribly wrong.

In an interview with Christianity Today Mel Gibson said, “It’s evil distorting good. What is more tender and beautiful than a mother and a child?  So the Devil takes that and distorts it just a little. Instead of a normal mother and child you have an androgynous figure holding a 40-year-old baby with hair on its back. It is weird, it is shocking, its almost too much-just like turning Jesus over to continue scourging him on his chest is shocking and almost too much, which is the exact moment when this appearance of the Devil and the baby take place.” Christianity Today article by Mark Moring, "What's Up With the Ugly Baby?  (http://www.christianitytoday.com/movies/news/040301-passion.html)

(top)

What was the meaning of the white cloths that Pilate's wife gave to Mary?

Again, this event does not appear in the New Testament Gospels, but it does appear in Emmerich's book, which inspired Gibson. Even then, Emmerich simply says the linens were "sent" to Mary, not personally delivered by Claudia. Still, the scene exhibits great empathy between Pilate's wife Claudia and the mother of Jesus.

 Emmerich writes: "When Jesus fell down at the foot of the pillar, after the flagellation, I saw Claudia Procles, the wife of Pilate, sent some large pieces of linen to the Mother of God. I know not whether she thought that Jesus would be set free, and that his Mother would then require linen to dress his wounds, or whether this compassionate lady was aware of the use which would be made of her present. At the termination of the scourging, Mary came to herself for a time, and saw her Divine Son all torn and mangled, being led away by the archers after the scouring: he wiped his eyes, which were filled with blood, that he might look at his Mother, and she stretched out her hands towards him, and continued to look at the bloody traces of his footsteps. I soon after saw Mary and Magdalen approach the pillar where Jesus had been scourged; the mob were at a distance, and they were partly concealed by the other holy women, and by a few kind-hearted persons who had joined them; they knelt down on the ground near the pillar, and wiped up the sacred blood with the linen which Claudia Procles had sent."

(top)

Did children really chase Judas to his hanging? What about the carcass on the field beneath the tree where Judas hung himself?

These are dramatic inventions employed by Gibson, but described by Anna Catherine Emmerich in her book.

(top)

Do the gospels record a raven attacking the bad thief (Gesmas) , the one speaking against Christ?

This event appears neither in the Gospels, nor in Emmerich's book. However, the raven has traditionally symbolized death, as in Edgar Allen Poe's classic poem.

(top)

Sources:

1.     Explore The Passion of Christ (www.thelife.com)

2.     Questions & Answers from the wed page of First Baptist Church of Fort Lauderdale Baptist Church (www.fbcnet.com)

3.     The Dolorous Passion of Jesus by Anna Catherine Emmerich can be viewed and read at: www.emmerich1.com/THE_PASSION.htm

4.      www.thepassionofchrist.com

5.     There are many articles and reviews at this site: www.bible.org (click on the Passion icon)

(top)

Back

Click here for Rev. Wright's review of "The Passion of the Christ".

 


Send comments to Webmaster

Last updated 03/07/2008

© 2008 First Baptist Church of Florence